Why I Keep Coming Back to C++, JavaScript, and Go

I’ve been coding for a while now, and honestly, there are three languages I always find myself reaching for. Not because they’re trendy or because someone told me to—but because each one scratches a different itch when I’m building something.

---

C++ — When I Want to Feel the Raw Power

There’s something uniquely satisfying about writing C++. It’s not a cozy experience—it’s a raw one. You’re constantly thinking about memory, pointers, and the intricate dance between your code and the machine. It’s a language that gives you complete control, a blank canvas where you can build anything you want, no abstractions getting in your way.

// You're in charge of memory here. It's exhilarating.
std::vector<int> numbers = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
for (const auto& num : numbers) {
    std::cout << num * 2 << " ";
}

This level of control is both its greatest strength and its most dangerous weakness. You can write code that’s incredibly fast and efficient, or you can shoot yourself in the foot with a memory leak. But that’s the point—the responsibility is all on you, and that’s an empowering feeling.

---

JavaScript — The Language of Flexibility

Let’s be real, JavaScript used to frustrate me. The quirks, the asynchronous callbacks, the weird this behavior—it felt like a wild west of programming. But somewhere along the way, I learned to love its chaos. It’s a language that doesn’t care about rules; it just wants to get the job done.

// The magic of async/await and hot reloading keeps things moving.
const processData = async (data) => {
    const result = await fetch('/api/process', {
        method: 'POST',
        body: JSON.stringify(data)
    });
    return result.json();
};

Whether it’s building a dynamic front end, spinning up a quick prototype with Node.js, or just automating a small task, JavaScript is there. Its ecosystem, from npm to hot reloading, is a testament to its flexibility and how fast you can iterate. It’s the ultimate tool for rapid development.

---

Go — The Beauty of Simplicity

Go feels like a breath of fresh air. It’s a language of deliberate choices. The standard library feels well-structured and intuitive, and the opinionated formatting (gofmt) means you never have to argue about style. It’s simple, yes, but not simplistic.

// Concurrency that just makes sense.
func main() {
    ch := make(chan string)

    go func() {
        ch <- "Hello from goroutine!"
    }()

    message := <-ch
    fmt.Println(message)

}

Go showed me a new way to think about things often handled by object-oriented programming, with its focus on composition over inheritance. The concurrency model is a game-changer—goroutines and channels make complex parallel tasks feel effortless. It’s proof that simplicity, when done right, can lead to powerful and elegant solutions.

---

What I’ve Learned

Each of these languages taught me something profound:

• C++ taught me that control and performance are a trade-off worth making when you need it.
• JavaScript showed me that sometimes, a messy, flexible tool is exactly what you need to move fast.
• Go reminded me that clarity, simplicity, and a strong standard library can get you further than any fancy new feature.

I don’t think there’s a “best” language. The best tool is the one that’s right for the job, and for me, these three languages cover just about every problem I want to solve. They make the process of coding not just a task, but a satisfying journey of discovery.